NESCA is currently accepting Therapy and Executive Function Coaching clients from middle school-age through adulthood with Therapist/Executive Function Coach/Parent Coach Carly Loureiro, MSW, LCSW. Carly specializes in the ASD population and also sees individuals who are highly anxious, depressed, or suffer with low self-esteem. She also offers parent coaching and family sessions when needed. For more information or to schedule appointments, please complete our Intake Form.

Tag

stigma

Image of the MA State House with quote from the blog

Access to Mental Health Care in Massachusetts: Challenges and Opportunities

By | NESCA Notes 2024

Image of the MA State House with quote from the blogBy: Rebecca Dautoff, Psy.D.
Pediatric Neuropsychologist, NESCA

Access to mental health care is an increasingly critical issue across the United States, and Massachusetts is no exception. While the state is often lauded for its comprehensive healthcare system and progressive policies, barriers to mental health care still persist. In this blog post, we will explore the current landscape of mental health services in Massachusetts, the challenges faced by individuals seeking care, and the initiatives being implemented to improve access.

The State of Mental Health Care in Massachusetts
Massachusetts has made significant strides in mental health care over the years. The state boasts some of the country’s leading hospitals, research institutions, and mental health professionals. Organizations such as the Massachusetts Department of Mental Health (DMH) and the Massachusetts Behavioral Health Partnership (MBHP) work to ensure that residents have access to necessary services, yet many still find it difficult to access care. There are also continuing racial inequities in medical and mental health care and a significant shortage of mental health providers of color.

Types of Services Available
Massachusetts offers a range of mental health services, including:

  • Inpatient Treatment: Hospitals provide acute care for individuals in crisis.
  • Outpatient Services: Clinics and private practices offer therapy and counseling sessions.
  • Community Support: Programs that focus on recovery and support that are community-based.
  • Telehealth Services: An increasingly popular option, especially since the COVID-19 pandemic, allows individuals to access care remotely.

Despite this variety of resources available, the gap between those in need and those receiving care remains significant.

Barriers to Accessing Mental Health Care

  1. Stigma and Misunderstanding

Stigma surrounding mental health issues is a significant barrier. Many individuals hesitate to seek help due to fear of judgment or misunderstanding by others. This stigma can come from family, friends, or even within professional environments. Education and awareness campaigns are essential to reducing stigma and encouraging individuals to seek the care they need.

  1. Insurance Limitations

While Massachusetts has implemented laws requiring insurance companies to provide equal coverage for mental and physical health services, discrepancies still exist. Many individuals find that their insurance plans have high deductibles, limited provider networks, or caps on the number of therapy sessions covered.

  1. Workforce Shortages

There is a notable shortage of mental health professionals in Massachusetts, particularly in rural areas. While urban centers like Boston have many providers, individuals in more remote locations often face long wait times or a lack of available services altogether. The distribution of resources is uneven, exacerbating access issues.

  1. Financial Barriers

Even with insurance, the cost of mental health care can be prohibitive. Copays, deductibles, and uncovered services can add up quickly, making it difficult for individuals to afford the care they need. Paying privately often leads to shorter wait times but is more expensive. Often families find themselves caught in a cycle where they need help but cannot afford it.

Current Initiatives and Improvements
To address these challenges, Massachusetts is taking steps to improve access to mental health care. Various initiatives are being implemented across the Commonwealth.

  1. Legislative Efforts

The Massachusetts State Legislature has been active in introducing bills aimed at improving access to mental health care. The “Mental Health Parity” law ensures that mental health care is treated on par with physical health care in terms of coverage. Advocacy groups continue to push for reforms that address loopholes and improve enforcement.

  1. Telehealth Expansion

The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the adoption of telehealth services, which have proven to be a valuable tool for increasing access to mental health care. Telehealth allows individuals to connect with therapists and psychiatrists from the comfort of their homes, reducing barriers related to transportation, location, and time constraints.

  1. Community-based Programs

Community-based mental health programs are essential in providing support and resources. Initiatives, like the Massachusetts Community Behavioral Health Center (CBHC) program, aim to create a network of services that meet the diverse needs of communities. These centers offer a variety of services, including crisis intervention and case management.

  1. Educational Campaigns

Efforts to combat stigma and raise awareness about mental health are crucial. Organizations like the National Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI) Massachusetts work tirelessly to educate the public about mental health issues, promote resources, and advocate for policy changes. These campaigns foster understanding and encourage individuals to seek help.

Looking Ahead: The Future of Mental Health Care in Massachusetts
The landscape of mental health care in Massachusetts is continually evolving. While significant challenges remain, the state is committed to addressing these issues through comprehensive reforms and community-based approaches.

  1. Continued Advocacy

Ongoing advocacy at both the grassroots and legislative levels is essential in pushing for systemic changes. By uniting voices and sharing personal stories, advocates can influence policies that prioritize access to mental health care.

  1. Innovative Solutions

As technology continues to advance, innovative solutions, such as mobile apps for mental health monitoring, digital therapy platforms, and AI-driven resources, could enhance accessibility.

Conclusion
Access to mental health care in Massachusetts is a multifaceted issue that requires ongoing attention and action. While challenges persist, the State legislature is committed to improving access to community programs and public awareness campaigns. By addressing stigma, financial barriers, and workforce shortages, Massachusetts can move closer to a system where mental health care is truly accessible for all. This journey continues. With continued advocacy and innovation, a brighter future for mental health care in the state is on the horizon.

How to Access Care
If you are or someone you love or care for is experiencing a mental health issue, you need to know how and where to find services. First, contact your primary care doctor or pediatrician. For parents or caregivers, the next contact should be someone at the child’s school. It could be an administrator, a teacher, or a mental health professional. Seek out additional information about what school personnel have observed about the child and find out about available resources at the school. This is an important part of treatment for a child.

 If you or the person you’re seeking to assist requires a crisis response to meet immediate safety needs, call 911, go to your local emergency room, or find your local Emergency Service Program by calling 877-382-1609.

Call or text the Massachusetts Behavioral Health Help Line (MBHHL) at 833-773-2445 for free, confidential support 24/7. Live chat is available at: https://www.masshelpline.com/. This helpline is useful even if you’re not sure what kind of help you need. Interpretation in over 200 languages is available in real time. Deaf or hard of hearing individuals can contact MassRelay at 711.

NAMI Compass is the information and referral helpline at NAMI Massachusetts. They provide resources and support to help people navigate the complex mental health system and problem solve in challenging situations. The COMPASS helpline is available Monday through Friday, 9 AM – 5 PM. Call the helpline at 617-704-6264 or 1-800-370-9085, or email them at compass@namimass.org.

SAMHSA’s National Helpline1-800-662-HELP (4357), (also known as the Treatment Referral Routing Service) or TTY: 1-800-487-4889 is a confidential, free, 24-hour-a-day, 365-day-a-year, information service, in English and Spanish, for individuals and family members facing mental and/or substance use disorders. This service provides referrals to local treatment facilities, support groups, and community-based organizations.

The Massachusetts Substance Use Helpline is a good resource for finding substance use treatment and recovery services. Helpline services are free and confidential. Call 1-800-327-5050.

The William James INTERFACE Referral Service aims to increase access to mental health and wellness services for individuals. Call the helpline at 888-244-6843 or 617-332-3666 from 9 AM- 5 PM on Monday, Wednesday and Friday, and 8 AM- 6 PM on Tuesday and Thursday, to work with a Resource and Referral Counselor who will help you navigate the challenges of finding mental health services. Communities served can be found on their website, https://interface.williamjames.edu/communities.

 

About the Author

Dr. Rebecca Dautoff provides comprehensive neuropsychological and psychological (projective) evaluation services for children, adolescents,Headshot of Rebecca Dautoff, Psy.D. and young adults who have complex presentations with a wide range of concerns, including attention deficit disorders, psychiatric disorders, intellectual disabilities, and autism spectrum disorders (ASD). She also values collaboration with families and outside providers to facilitate supports and services that are tailored to each child’s specific needs.

 

If you are interested in booking an appointment for an evaluation with Dr. Dautoff or another NESCA neuropsychologist/clinician, please fill out and submit our online intake form

 

NESCA is a pediatric neuropsychology practice and integrative treatment center with offices in Newton, Plainville, and Hingham, Massachusetts; Londonderry, New Hampshire; the greater Burlington, Vermont region; and Brooklyn, New York (coaching services only) serving clients from infancy through young adulthood and their families. For more information, please email info@nesca-newton.com or call 617-658-9800.

Image of flowers coming out of a person's head, symbolizing various mental health disorders/diagnoses

Understanding Diagnostic Labels

By | NESCA Notes 2024

Image of flowers coming out of a person's head, symbolizing various mental health disorders/diagnosesBy: Lauren Halladay, Ph.D.
Pediatric Neuropsychologist, NESCA

Throughout the evaluation process, many families express concern about the potential negative impacts of placing diagnostic labels on a child. Unfortunately, parental worries associated with stigmatization, as well as others making incorrect assumptions and placing inappropriate expectations on their child are common and valid. As such, it is reasonable to ask, “where does diagnostic labeling come from?”

In 1952, the first version of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) was developed by the American Psychological Association (APA) as the standard classification of mental disorders used by mental health professionals in the United States. Since that time, several iterations of the DSM have been developed. Most recently, the DSM-IV- Text Revision (TR) was published (2022), in which sections of text describing diagnostic categories and associated features were revised based on new research. Hundreds of international experts in all aspects of mental health contributed to the development of the DSM, as well as adjustments to subsequent versions.

There are certainly benefits and drawbacks for making specific diagnoses, a few of which are detailed below:

 

Pros Cons
  • Provides a common language in an effort to help mental health and medical professionals communicate effectively.
  • May provide some relief to clients who come to find their symptoms are associated with a disorder that others also experience.
  • Helps guide providers in recommending appropriate treatment options based on diagnostic presentation.
  • May not fully account for contextual influences, such as ethnicity and culture on the development of psychopathology.
  • Potential for disagreements related to interpreting diagnostic criteria when trying to make diagnostic decisions.
  • Places individuals into “boxes,” which can lead to stigmatization.

Broadly, much of the neuropsychological evaluation process focuses on identifying how a child’s behavioral, emotional, and/or social functioning may be discrepant from that of their peers for the purpose of identifying appropriate treatment and educational services to support the child. Of equal importance is highlighting the child’s strengths, as well as understanding individual family values and cultural factors that may be contributing to a child’s presentation.

As neuropsychologists at NESCA, we take a holistic view of your child and consider multiple sources of information when answering referral questions, including information from parents, teachers, providers with whom the child has developed strong rapport, as well as our observations throughout the evaluation process. While we do refer to the DSM when making diagnoses, we pride ourselves on taking an incredibly individualized approach and high level of care when working with clients. Our goal is not to simply put your child in a “box” and send you on your way. We seek to understand your child’s symptoms and how they impact functioning across environments. We consider initial evaluations as the first step in your journey to fully understanding your child, treating the aspects of their presentation that you’d like to prioritize, and ultimately promoting their overall well-being and success.

 

About Lauren Halladay, Ph.D.

Dr. Halladay conducts comprehensive evaluations of toddlers, preschoolers, and school-aged children with a wide range of developmental, behavioral, and emotional concerns. She particularly enjoys working with individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder, Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, and complex medical conditions. She has experience working in schools, as well as outpatient and inpatient hospital settings. She is passionate about optimizing outcomes for children with neurodevelopmental disabilities by providing evidence-based, family-oriented care.

 

If you are interested in booking an appointment for an evaluation with a Dr. Halladay or another NESCA neuropsychologist/clinician, please fill out and submit our online intake form

 

NESCA is a pediatric neuropsychology practice and integrative treatment center with offices in Newton, Plainville, and Hingham, Massachusetts; Londonderry, New Hampshire; the greater Burlington, Vermont region; and Brooklyn, New York (coaching services only) serving clients from infancy through young adulthood and their families. For more information, please email info@nesca-newton.com or call 617-658-9800.

Receiving, Understanding, and Sharing Diagnostic Labels and Profiles

By | NESCA Notes 2022

By Yvonne M. Asher, Ph.D. 
Pediatric Neuropsychologist

A recent New York Times article described a trend, noticed by many mental health professionals, where adolescents and young adults have been exploring mental health on social media. The article references the explosion of TikTok videos in which individuals disclose their psychiatric diagnoses and symptoms. For young people searching on social media, these videos are shown at an increasing rate, based on algorithms. Young people are finding a great deal of validation and connection by watching these videos. Many begin to seek out mental health support, often entering the therapeutic relationship with a clear idea of what their diagnosis will be.

As a mental health professional, I see a great deal of complexity coming from this trend. Certainly, the dissemination of information about mental health and reduction in stigma seems to be positive. Allowing individuals to more readily learn about psychiatric conditions will hopefully reduce fear, embarrassment, shame, and avoidance of mental health care. In addition, promoting self-understanding is important, particularly for young people who are in a developmental stage of identity exploration.

However, there are also concerning implications. First, self-diagnosis can be problematic in mental health, as it is in the medical field. There is a fine balance between being an informed health care consumer and a patient unwilling to listen to the expert opinion of their physician. Entering a physician’s office, unwavering in certainty of your diagnosis, can lead to friction and frustration. In contrast, entering with relevant personal and family history, a thoughtful list of your current symptoms, and readily accessible notes on recent changes in your lifestyle can be invaluable in partnering with your doctor to determine the origin of the problem. This is paralleled in mental health. Entering a therapeutic or evaluation process with information and an open mind is vital to the partnership between clients and clinicians.

The other implication of this trend involves the necessity of a formal diagnosis. I hear from many individuals, after a comprehensive neuropsychological evaluation is completed, that they feel relief at “finally knowing what is wrong.” This validation is entirely understandable, and is not restricted to times when I have provided a diagnostic label. An in-depth exploration of neurocognitive strengths and weaknesses can provide invaluable information that can help individuals understand themselves, access what they need, and plan for their future. Sometimes, a client’s symptoms are best captured by a diagnostic label. However, other times, a person’s comprehensively evaluated profile does not warrant a formal diagnosis. The latter does not mean that a person’s symptoms are any less valid or impactful. Formal diagnoses generally require multiple symptoms, occurring within specified timeframes, and occurring in the presence or absence of other important factors. There are many instances where a symptom is clearly impactful and interfering for a client, without the client’s profile meeting the full range of criteria necessary for a diagnosis. At other times, a symptom that appears, on the surface, to indicate one diagnosis, may in fact indicate a very different diagnosis after a person’s full neuropsychological profile is explored.

As a wise mentor once told me that, in the evaluation process, we must “hold our hypotheses lightly.” We enter a therapeutic relationship, either as a client or a clinician, with a sense of what we might discover or be told. Our initial sense can be entirely accurate, or shockingly incorrect. Therefore, it is vital for all of us to hold our ideas about what may come from an evaluation lightly.

 

About the Author

Dr. Yvonne M. Asher enjoys working with a wide range of children and teens, including those with autism spectrum disorder, developmental delays, learning disabilities, attention difficulties and executive functioning challenges. She often works with children whose complex profiles are not easily captured by a single label or diagnosis. She particularly enjoys working with young children and helping parents through their “first touch” with mental health care or developmental concerns.

Dr. Asher’s approach to assessment is gentle and supportive, and recognizes the importance of building rapport and trust. When working with young children, Dr. Asher incorporates play and “games” that allow children to complete standardized assessments in a fun and engaging environment.

Dr. Asher has extensive experience working in public, charter and religious schools, both as a classroom teacher and psychologist. She holds a master’s degree in education and continues to love working with educators. As a psychologist working in public schools, she gained invaluable experience with the IEP process from start to finish. She incorporates both her educational and psychological training when formulating recommendations to school teams.

Dr. Asher attended Swarthmore College and the Jewish Theological Seminary. She completed her doctoral degree at Suffolk University, where her dissertation looked at the impact of starting middle school on children’s social and emotional wellbeing. After graduating, she completed an intensive fellowship at the MGH Lurie Center for Autism, where she worked with a wide range of children, adolescents and young adults with autism and related disorders.

 

Neuropsychology & Education Services for Children & Adolescents (NESCA) is a pediatric neuropsychology practice and integrative treatment center with offices in Newton, Massachusetts, Plainville, Massachusetts, and Londonderry, New Hampshire, serving clients from preschool through young adulthood and their families. For more information, please email info@nesca-newton.com or call 617-658-9800.

 

To book an appointment with Dr. Yvonne Asher, please complete our Intake Form today. For more information about NESCA, please email info@nesca-newton.com or call 617-658-9800.