NESCA’s Newton, MA location has immediate availability for neuropsychological evaluations. Our MA clinicians specialize in the following evaluations: Neuropsychological; Autism; and Emotional and Psychological, as well as Academic Achievement and Learning Disability Testing.

Visit www.nesca-newton.com/intake for more information or to book an evaluation.

Category

NESCA Notes 2024

Subscribe to NESCA Notes

13
Image of a feedback session with a parent and neuropsychologist along with a quote from Dr. Rodriguez

Beyond a Label: The Value of Neuropsychological Evaluation Even When There’s No Clear Diagnosis

By | NESCA Notes 2024

Image of a feedback session with a parent and neuropsychologist along with a quote from Dr. RodriguezBy: Maggie Rodriguez, Psy.D.
Pediatric Neuropsychologist, NESCA

Why Diagnosis Matters

Most parents seek out a neuropsychological evaluation because they’re looking for answers. Often, someone in the child’s life—whether a parent, teacher, or caregiver—has noticed something that doesn’t quite add up. Pursuing testing is a wise and proactive step toward understanding the root of a child’s challenges. In many cases, families hope to find a diagnosis that explains what’s going on. To borrow a phrase from psychiatrist and author Dan Siegel, “You have to name it to tame it.” Having a name for a child’s difficulties is often the first step toward effective support and intervention. Many parents describe feeling validated and relieved when a professional can identify and explain what their child is experiencing. Knowing there is an understandable reason behind their child’s struggles can be both reassuring and empowering.

Why A Clear Diagnosis Isn’t Always Possible

Despite everyone’s best efforts, sometimes a child’s challenges don’t fit neatly into a single diagnostic label. There are several reasons for this:

  • Human complexity: Diagnoses can be helpful frameworks, but they don’t always capture the full picture. Children are wonderfully complex, and their unique mix of strengths and challenges often doesn’t align perfectly with one specific category.
  • Overlap between conditions: Diagnoses are often presented as distinct “boxes,” but in real life, there is a lot of overlap between conditions. It’s often more accurate to picture diagnoses as overlapping circles in a Venn diagram, with many children’s experiences falling in the spaces where these circles intersect. It’s not always possible—or even helpful—to fully separate features into distinct diagnoses.
  • Gradual emergence of symptoms: Some conditions develop slowly and may not be fully recognizable until later in life. For example, mild Autism Spectrum Disorder can be subtle and hard to identify, especially in gender-conforming girls and women. Social challenges may not be obvious in early childhood but can become clearer as social demands increase in adolescence, delaying a clear diagnosis.
  • Lack of formal diagnostic labels: There are profiles commonly seen in clinical settings that don’t yet have formal diagnostic labels. For instance, significant executive functioning weaknesses can greatly impact daily life and academics, but there is no official diagnosis for this. Similarly, while we may use the term “Non-Verbal Learning Disorder” to describe certain patterns of difficulty with visual-spatial skills, organization, social cues, or motor abilities, this label isn’t formally recognized in current diagnostic systems.

What To Do Next

Receiving an evaluation without a clear diagnosis can be disappointing and even anxiety-provoking for parents; however, a neuropsychological assessment still offers significant value. The true strength of a thorough evaluation lies in its ability to provide a detailed understanding of your child’s unique strengths and challenges, and to clearly outline the supports and interventions that will be most helpful. Even among children who share a diagnosis, there can be important differences in how their difficulties present. A high-quality assessment goes beyond simply assigning a label; rather, it paints a comprehensive picture of your child as an individual. Ultimately, the most effective recommendations are those tailored specifically to your child’s needs, regardless of whether they meet criteria for a particular diagnosis.

If you find yourself in this situation, allow yourself space for your feelings. It’s natural to crave clear answers, and it can be difficult to live with uncertainty. Yet, there are concrete steps you can take:

  • Recognize challenges independently of diagnosis: Throughout history, people have faced real and significant difficulties long before science could provide official explanations. For example, prior to advanced imaging, vision problems caused by multiple sclerosis were often mislabeled as “hysterical blindness” until CT scans revealed nervous system lesions. Similarly, before HIV was identified as the cause of AIDS, individuals suffered and died from the illness without a clear diagnosis. Sometimes, it takes time for science to catch up. In the same way, your child’s needs are real and valid, regardless of whether a formal diagnosis has been made.
  • Advocate for your unique child: Similarly, focus on addressing their specific areas of need, rather than waiting for a label.
  • Seek appropriate support services: There’s no need to wait for a formal diagnosis to pursue executive function coaching, psychotherapy, occupational or speech therapy, or specialized academic support. In some cases, early intervention may even help prevent a difficulty from becoming a full-blown diagnosis.
  • Try to be patient and stay open to change:  Remember that your child is still developing in very significant ways. Consider re-evaluation in a few years, as more information may become clear over time.

Remember, your child is more than a label. The insights from a neuropsychological evaluation can guide you in supporting their growth and well-being, even when there isn’t a specific diagnostic term to describe their unique profile. If you have questions or want to discuss whether a neuropsychological evaluation might be helpful, our team is here to support you.

 

About the Author

Maggie Rodriguez, Psy.D., provides comprehensive evaluation services for children, adolescents, and young adults with often complex presentations. She particularly enjoys working with individuals who have concerns about attention and executive functioning, language-based learning disorders, and those with overlapping cognitive and social/emotional difficulties.

Prior to joining NESCA, Dr. Rodriguez worked in private practice, where she completed assessments with high-functioning students presenting with complex cognitive profiles whose areas of weakness may have gone previously undiagnosed. Dr. Rodriguez’s experience also includes pre- and post-doctoral training in the Learning Disability Clinic at Boston Children’s Hospital and the Neurodevelopmental Center at MassGeneral for Children/North Shore Medical Center. Dr. Rodriguez has spent significant time working with students in academic settings, including k-12 public and charter school systems and private academic programs, such as the Threshold Program at Lesley University.

Dr. Rodriguez earned her Psy.D. from William James College in 2012, where her coursework and practicum training focused on clinical work with children and adolescents and on assessment. Her doctoral thesis centered on cultural issues related to evaluation.

Dr. Rodriguez lives north of Boston with her husband and three young children.  She enjoys spending time outdoors hiking and bike riding with her family, practicing yoga, and reading.

To book a consultation with Dr. Rodriguez or one of our many other expert neuropsychologists, complete NESCA’s online intake form.

NESCA is a pediatric neuropsychology practice and integrative treatment center with offices in Newton, Plainville, and Hingham, Massachusetts; Londonderry, New Hampshire; the greater Burlington, Vermont region; and Brooklyn, NY, serving clients from infancy through young adulthood and their families. For more information, please email info@nesca-newton.com or call 617-658-9800.

50
Image of a student being testing in school

When School-based Testing Is Not Enough

By | NESCA Notes 2024, NESCA Notes 2025

Image of a student being testing in schoolBy: Sean Hyde O’Brien, Psy.D., ABPdN 
Pediatric Neuropsychologist, NESCA

Often when a child is struggling at school — whether related to academic, behavioral, or social-emotional functioning — they may be referred for testing by a member of their educational team (often at the parents’ request). Such testing can include psychological, educational, speech-language, occupational, and physical therapy assessments conducted by qualified school personnel, as well as more specialized transition, functional/adaptive behavioral, and autism-related assessments. These evaluations are generally conducted to determine a student’s eligibility for special education services, identify appropriate supports, and establish goals to monitor progress.

In many cases, school-based testing is sufficient to meet the needs of the student and family by facilitating access to services and supports. However, there are situations in which school-based testing may not be sufficient on its own:

Need for a Clinical Diagnosis
School evaluations are designed to determine eligibility for special education services under educational categories (e.g., “Health Impairment,” “Specific Learning Disability,” or “Sensory Impairment”), rather than to establish diagnoses for medical or treatment purposes. When a formal diagnosis is needed to guide treatment, medication decisions, or access to private insurance-based services, a neuropsychological evaluation may be necessary.

Complex or Co-occurring Issues
Neuropsychological evaluations are designed to integrate information across multiple domains, offering a more comprehensive understanding of the student as a whole.

Disagreement with School Findings
If parents have concerns about the conclusions or recommendations from a school evaluation, they may pursue an Independent Educational Evaluation (IEE) or seek private testing with a neuropsychologist to obtain an additional perspective.

Evaluation of Non-academic Concerns
Concerns such as anxiety, depression, trauma, or family stressors — which can significantly affect learning — may fall outside the primary scope of school-based testing and may be more fully explored through a comprehensive neuropsychological evaluation.

Legal or Eligibility Requirements
Certain services, accommodations, or agencies (such as Social Security Disability benefits, specific therapies, or independent schools) may require documentation or diagnoses from a licensed clinical provider. Neuropsychologists are licensed psychologists with specialized doctoral and post-doctoral training in brain-behavior relationships who can provide this type of documentation when needed.

In summary, school-based testing is often a valuable and important first step in understanding a child’s needs within the educational setting. In some cases, however, a comprehensive neuropsychological evaluation can provide additional insight into a student’s profile as well as medical documentation needed to access a variety of services.

 

About the Author

Dr. Sean O’Brien has been providing comprehensive neuropsychological evaluations in the GreaterSean Hyde O'Brien Boston area since 2006. He specializes in the assessment of children and adolescents who present with a wide range of developmental conditions, such as  Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder, Specific Learning Disorder (reading, writing, math), Intellectual Disability, and Autism Spectrum Disorder; as well as children whose cognitive functioning has been impacted by medical, psychiatric, and genetic conditions. He also has extensive experience working with children who were adopted both domestically and internationally.

To schedule an appointment with one of NESCA’s neuropsychologists, please complete our online intake form. 

NESCA is a pediatric neuropsychology practice and integrative treatment center with offices in Newton, Plainville, and Hingham, Massachusetts; Londonderry, New Hampshire; the greater Burlington, Vermont region; and Coral Gables, Florida, serving clients from infancy through young adulthood and their families. For more information, please email info@nesca-newton.com or call 617-658-9800.

16
Image of a sign saying, "You Belong Here."

Is Inclusion Enough?

By | NESCA Notes 2024

Image of a sign saying, "You Belong Here."By Dot Lucci, M.Ed., CAGS
Director of Consultation and Psychoeducational Services, NESCA

In the United States, we have federal and state laws that support individuals with disabilities: The ADA, IDEA, Section 504 of the 1973 Rehabilitation, Chapter 766, Chapter 688, and more. Each of these laws supports the inclusion of individuals with disabilities at school, in employment, and in the community by mandating wheelchair ramps/automatic doors, mainstreaming children with special needs into general education classrooms, assistive technology for an individual at a workplace, and more. We have made many strides in including people with disabilities; yet there is still a long way to go.

In education circles, the word inclusion has effectively replaced the term mainstream. By definition, inclusion means placing students with disabilities in regular or “mainstream” settings along with their “non-disabled” peers, focusing on the “physical integration” of children with disabilities rather than, what was more common at the time – placing them into separate, segregated or “self-contained” settings with other “disabled peers.”

Inclusion embodies a shift from just physical inclusion/integration to a broader definition that promotes equal access and support for all children, creating an environment that promotes the success of every student regardless of ability (Karlsudd, 2017). Inclusion, at its best should offer universally designed environments/curricula, specialized supports, services, accommodations, modifications, and differentiation in instruction, and more, as all students – whether identified as “special needs” or typical – are unique in their learning profiles.

Education lecturer and researcher Gregor Maxwell, 2018, describes in a published article, three perspectives on inclusion. They are:

  • The Compensation Perspective is like the deficit model or medical model which emphasizes a child’s impairment or limitation as the reason for exclusion. It focuses on Identifying the limitation/deficit and remediating it through individualized accommodations and supports that enable the student to be included.
  • The Critical Perspective is comparable to the Social Model of Disability in that it identifies the problem within the broader context of the environment, and the focus is on changing policies, structures, and attitudes about disability and inclusion.
  • The Dilemma Perspective is a critique of the Compensation and Critical Perspectives. It emphasizes that meaningful participation is central to inclusion, and that inclusive practices need to recognize and celebrate the diversity of all children regardless of whether they have a disability or not. Participation is defined as the involvement in life situations with family, same-aged peers, and other community members, and is distinct from inclusion, according to the International Classification of Function, Disability, and Health (ICF) of the World Health Organization.

While individuals with disabilities are being included and participating in schools, in employment settings, and in the community, there still seems to be the lingering question of, “Is inclusion and participation enough?” Do individuals with disabilities feel valued and honored for who they are? Are their strengths being recognized (ideally, the new Massachusetts IEP form should help with this)? Do they feel like they are “one of the gang,” like they belong/fit it and have friends? Having worked in many public schools, I think many students with disabilities are participating in inclusion activities but don’t feel like they belong nor are valued for who they are.

Erik Carter, professor of Special Education at Vanderbilt University, has studied inclusion and belonging for many years. He concludes, “Where we once pursued integration, we now talk about promoting inclusion. But my sense is that both terms fall short of what really matters most. People want to be more than merely integrated or included. They want to experience true belonging.” In more recent years, schools have been focusing on social and emotional learning (SEL), yet many students with and without disabilities still feel isolated and like they don’t fit in/belong. Belonging, feeling valued for who one is and being recognized for one’s strengths, is more significant than inclusion. It is at the very core of who we are as humans; it is a basic need. Let’s help our special needs students feel that they belong. Let’s hope that as the new MA IEP, with its focus on student strengths and participation, will be afford us the opportunity to focus on what truly matters…a sense of belonging for all of our students.

For more information and helpful handouts about Erik Carter’s approach, visit: Progress Center Reflecting on our Practice: Ten Ways Schools Can Foster Belonging Among Students With and Without Disabilities https://promotingprogress.org/sites/default/files/2022-02/Fostering_Belonging_Handout.pdf

 

Resources

Erik Carter https://www.erikwcarter.com

Karlsudd, P. (2017) The Search for Successful Inclusion. DCID, 28(1), 142-160.

Maxwell, G.R. Granlund, M. & Augustine, L. (2018) Inclusion through participation: Understanding participation in the international classification of functioning, disability, and health as a methodological research tool for investigating inclusion. Frontiers in Education, (3), Article 41, 1- 16.

 

About the Author

NESCA’s Director of Consultation and Psychoeducational Services Dot Lucci has been active in the fields of education, psychology, research and academia for over 30 years. She is a national consultant and speaker on program design and the inclusion of children and adolescents with special needs, especially those diagnosed with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). Prior to joining NESCA, Ms. Lucci was the Principal of the Partners Program/EDCO Collaborative and previously the Program Director and Director of Consultation at MGH/Aspire for 13 years, where she built child, teen and young adult programs and established the 3-Ss (self-awareness, social competency and stress management) as the programming backbone. She also served as director of the Autism Support Center. Ms. Lucci was previously an elementary classroom teacher, special educator, researcher, school psychologist, college professor and director of public schools, a private special education school and an education collaborative.

Ms. Lucci directs NESCA’s consultation services to public and private schools, colleges and universities, businesses and community agencies. She also provides psychoeducational counseling directly to students and parents. Ms. Lucci’s clinical interests include mind-body practices, positive psychology, and the use of technology and biofeedback devices in the instruction of social and emotional learning, especially as they apply to neurodiverse individuals.

To book a consultation with Ms. Lucci or one of our many expert clinicians, complete NESCA’s online intake form. Indicate whether you are seeking an “evaluation” or “consultation” and your preferred clinician/consultant/service in the referral line.

NESCA is a pediatric neuropsychology and related services practice with offices in Newton, Plainville, and Hingham, Massachusetts; Londonderry, New Hampshire; the greater Burlington, Vermont region; and Coral Gables, Florida, serving clients from infancy through young adulthood and their families. For more information, please email info@nesca-newton.com or call 617-658-9800.

 

10
Image of a teen male feeling frustrated with a therapist and a quote from Dr. Moira Creedon

Bridging the Gap between Neuropsychological Testing and Therapy

By | NESCA Notes 2024

Image of a teen male feeling frustrated with a therapist and a quote from Dr. Moira CreedonBy: Moira Creedon, Ph.D. 
NESCA Hingham Director & Pediatric Neuropsychologist

Sometimes therapy hits a wall. A child or teen may be attending sessions regularly but still seems “stuck.” They might be unable to make progress, reluctant to engage, or struggling in ways that don’t fully add up. Even the most dedicated clients, those who do their therapy “homework” and participate openly, may continue to face challenges outside of the therapy room. This can be both frustrating and confounding for everyone involved. In these situations, neuropsychological testing does not have to be a last resort. It can be a powerful, collaborative tool that helps uncover what might be happening or why certain obstacles keep getting in the way. By clarifying diagnoses, identifying how a child or teen processes information, and highlighting cognitive or emotional patterns, neuropsychological testing offers insight that can shape therapeutic work to offer meaningful change.

There are few key gaps that neuropsychological testing can help to fill that are not a part of the normal course of therapy. First, neuropsychologists tend to get more extensive histories across all domains. Often times, therapists get some history about the presenting symptoms right away, but then they quickly have to dive into supporting a child, building rapport, providing psychoeducation, or practicing new coping strategies.

Neuropsychologists tend to get data across a broader range of developmental patterns for a holistic understanding of how the child has developed. Secondly, neuropsychologists then get concrete, quantifiable data on how a child or teen processes information – what their cognition is, how they encode and store information in their memory, how they tackle a hard problem, how they interpret a social challenge, and how they reflect on their own emotional experience. The focus is on how a person processes information, not just what their current symptoms are.

Why is this important? Take, for example, the case of a recent 16-year-old seen for neuropsychological testing who was in therapy for years due to a general sense of worry. Neuropsychological testing helped to highlight problems with cognitive flexibility, poor working memory, and distractibility. In addition to her anxiety, she was also struggling with ADHD. Lapses in attention were making her more anxious, leading her to long hours studying, blaming herself for her shortcomings. these long study sessions were disorganized and inefficient because of inherent executive functioning problems.

Take another example of a younger child who was 7-years-old. His parents felt frustrated by his dysregulated behaviors at home. He was disengaged in therapy and seemed unable to talk with his parents about what was going on after a big incident. Neuropsychological testing helped to undercover significant problems with language processing. This led to more frustration as he could not explain why he was upset, and traditional “talk therapy” methods had to be adapted so that language was simple and concrete.

By uncovering a child or teen’s unique profile, a family and the therapist can gain a wealth of information about what might be driving the presenting issues. This is one reason it is important to frame a referral for neuropsychological testing as a tool of discovery, not as a last resort or sign that treatment is failing. Diagnostic clarity is not about labeling; it is about understanding. It is a process of giving a complete picture of a child or teen’s functioning, seeking alternative pathways for change, and capitalizing on the client’s strengths.

With new information provided in neuropsychological testing, therapists can collaborate with a neuropsychologist to individualize treatment. Here are some examples for how testing can help therapists:

  • A therapist can slow down their interventions and offer more repetition for children with processing speed troubles.
  • A therapist can use simplified language for a child with cognitive impairments or reduced language skills.
  • A therapist can reduce the “homework” they assign for a teen with weak working memory and executive functioning deficits.
  • A therapist can pull in a new evidence-based treatment when anxiety veers into a pattern of intense obsessions and compulsive behaviors in a teen with OCD.
  • A therapist can support a teen overwhelmed with anxiety when facing a mountain of assignments at school if their executive functioning challenges make it hard for them to break down these tasks into smaller steps.
  • A therapist can explore the opportunity to collaborate with an executive functioning coach, group therapy program, or psychiatrist if a child’s profile suggests this is helpful.

When therapy stalls, it doesn’t mean a child isn’t trying or the treatment isn’t helpful. It might mean we are missing part of the picture. Neuropsychological testing can offer the insight needed to move forward with greater compassion, precision, and effectiveness.

Being “stuck” does not have to be seen as a sign of failure. It can be a turning point or an opportunity to uncover processing patterns that shift the focus from blame to change. When testing and therapy work hand in hand, they offer families not just answers, but a compassionate and informed way forward.

 

About the Author

Dr. Creedon offers her expertise in evaluating children and teens with a variety of presenting issues. SheMoira Creedon headshot is interested in uncovering an individual’s unique pattern of strengths and weaknesses to best formulate a plan for intervention and success. She tailors each assessment to address a range of referral questions, such as developmental disabilities, including Autism Spectrum Disorder, learning disabilities, attention challenges, executive functioning deficits, and social-emotional struggles. She also evaluates college-/grad school-age/adult individuals with developmental issues, such as ASD and ADHD, particularly when there is a diagnostic clarity or accommodation question.

 

If you are interested in booking an evaluation with Dr. Creedon or another NESCA neuropsychologist, please fill out and submit our online intake form. 

 

NESCA is a pediatric neuropsychology practice and integrative treatment center with offices in Newton, Plainville, and Hingham, Massachusetts; Londonderry, New Hampshire; and the greater Burlington, Vermont region, serving clients from infancy through young adulthood and their families. For more information, please email info@nesca-newton.com or call 617-658-9800.

50
image of adoption papers and a quote from Sean Hyde O'Brien

Myth vs. Reality: Adoption, Development, and the Role of Neuropsychology

By | NESCA Notes 2024

image of adoption papers and a quote from Sean Hyde O'BrienBy: Sean Hyde O’Brien, Psy.D., ABPdN 
Pediatric Neuropsychologist, NESCA

Adoption is a wonderful way to create family. I say this both as a psychologist who has extensive research and clinical experience working with this population, as well as a person who was adopted. However, my experience working with children and families in the “adoption triad” over the past 20 years has made me aware of the negative stereotypes that are perpetuated by well-meaning professionals that are simply not based in fact and can, in fact, have a deleterious impact on the health and development of those children whom they are trying to serve.

In simplest terms, there is nothing inherently pathological about the process of adoption or individuals who were adopted. Yes, there can be particular family dynamics and developmental issues unique to the adoptive experience (for an interesting perspective on child development through an adoptive lens, see Dr. Joyce Pavao’s “The Family of Adoption”). However, these can be thought of much like other demographic factors that contribute to our development but do not define who we are in totality, such as ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, or socioeconomic status.

So, if adoptive status is not a causal factor for later psychopathology, why do some children who were adopted display emotional, behavioral, and learning challenges? This is where neuropsychology comes into play. Research suggests that children adopted at older ages, from foster care, or from institutional settings have a higher risk for certain psychological challenges compared to non-adopted peers. However, this increased risk is not due to adoption itself but rather to neurobiological factors that are known to result in developmental challenges regardless of adoptive status. These can include sensory, cognitive, and social deprivation; chronic early stress; attachment disruptions; and teratogenic exposure (e.g., factors that can cause developmental abnormalities in a fetus); all factors that are known to impact the developing brain.

For example, a child who has been separated from their primary caregiver during an early sensitive period of development may show delays in social cognition, understanding others’ emotions, and their ability to form peer relationships. While this child could have been adopted after living in an orphanage, they may also be a non-adoptive child who was separated from their birth parent secondary to an injury/illness and subsequent hospitalization or had a birth parent who was not consistently available due to their own medical or mental health issues. The adoptive status of the child is not the issue at hand, rather the specific experiences of the individual, and for a professional to simply label a child’s challenges as a result of their adoptive status is overly simplistic and possibly unethical.

Thus, as with all children, it is important to understand the “whys” (e.g., why are they having this particular problem) to figure out the “hows” (e.g., how do parents and professionals best address it) when working with children who were adopted. This often requires a comprehensive evaluation of neuropsychological functioning that goes beyond the label of “adopted child” and helps to identify both the risk and protective factors unique to that individual that will impact their health and development.

 

About the Author

Dr. Sean O’Brien has been providing comprehensive neuropsychological evaluations in the GreaterSean Hyde O'Brien Boston area since 2006. He specializes in the assessment of children and adolescents who present with a wide range of developmental conditions, such as  Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder, Specific Learning Disorder (reading, writing, math), Intellectual Disability, and Autism Spectrum Disorder; as well as children whose cognitive functioning has been impacted by medical, psychiatric, and genetic conditions. He also has extensive experience working with children who were adopted both domestically and internationally.

To schedule an appointment with one of NESCA’s neuropsychologists, please complete our online intake form. 

NESCA is a pediatric neuropsychology practice and integrative treatment center with offices in Newton, Plainville, and Hingham, Massachusetts; Londonderry, New Hampshire; the greater Burlington, Vermont region; and Brooklyn, NY (coaching services only) serving clients from infancy through young adulthood and their families. For more information, please email info@nesca-newton.com or call 617-658-9800.

12
Image of a tortoise studying on a notebook with a quote from Miranda Milana, Psy.D., NESCA Neuropsychologist

Smart Doesn’t Always Mean Fast: Understanding Intelligence and Processing Speed

By | NESCA Notes 2024

Image of a tortoise studying on a notebook with a quote from Miranda Milana, Psy.D., NESCA NeuropsychologistBy Miranda Milana, Psy.D.
Pediatric Neuropsychologist

Picture what it means to be intelligent.

Do you imagine someone who knows many facts about a variety of topics? Someone who has quick wit? The first person to offer up answers? Chances are that you picture someone who not only knows a lot of information—but thinks fast on their feet. Maybe you envision someone who finishes tests before everyone else, completes homework effortlessly, or could dominate any round of Jeopardy.

Those are all common examples of what comes to mind when someone is described as “smart.” Society often rewards efficiency and how fast someone is to provide answers and results, which is why we equate efficiency and speed with high intellect. The fact of the matter is that intelligence does not always mean fast, and there are many extremely bright individuals who perform slower when it comes to tasks like timed tests, fast-paced conversations, or quick decision-making.

This might seem confusing—how can someone so clearly intelligent struggle to perform tasks efficiently? If they have so many answers, why can’t they provide them quickly?

The answer to this question lies in how our brains are wired. Your cognitive profile is complex and includes many factors. Someone can be intellectually gifted, or considered a “genius,” but still be slow to process information.

If you imagine the brain as a car:

  • Core cognitive abilities—things like reasoning, memory, and language—are the engine. They represent how powerful, thoughtfully designed, and capable the car is.
  • Processing speed is the acceleration. It’s how fast that car can go.

Some people might have a powerful engine that takes longer to accelerate. Once it gets going, however, and gains momentum, it can go far and handle any road it encounters. Others might have very fast acceleration but a reduced capability of maneuvering on complex routes.

How Does This Happen?

Many individuals with this “smart but slow” learning profile have exceptional cognitive skills but need more time to show what they know as it takes them longer to take in, make sense of, and respond to information (functions of processing speed).

This discrepancy between intellect and processing speed can cause significant frustration, both for the individual and for those around them. It can be especially difficult in environments that place an emphasis on speed, such as classrooms, standardized testing, or high-pressure workplaces with fast work deadlines/turnaround times.

Factors that Affect Processing Speed

Some brains are simply wired for a slower pace. But other factors can influence processing speed as well, including:

  • Anxiety
  • ADHD and attentional differences
  • Autism spectrum traits
  • Depression and mood disorders
  • Fatigue or chronic stress
  • Substance use or medications

These factors can cause weaknesses and/or variability in processing speed—even in individuals with otherwise high cognitive reasoning abilities. Unfortunately, this “smart but slow” presentation often leads to incorrect labels, such as laziness or reduced capabilities, when in fact, they just need more time to showcase what they know.

No matter the reason for slower processing speed, these individuals benefit from accommodations and strategies such as:

  • Extended time on tasks, tests, or writing assignments
  • Flexible expectations in fast-paced discussions or decision-making settings
  • Alternative ways to demonstrate knowledge, like untimed projects or creating visuals

Now that we have taken some time to understand how intelligence is defined, I encourage you to consider expanding your idea of what comprises intelligence as a whole the next time someone asks you what it means to be intelligent. Some of the most insightful, creative, and capable thinkers are the ones who take their time to pause, reflect, and dive deep before they respond. These individuals might be the smartest people in the room who just move at their own pace and deserve just as much recognition.

 

About the Author

Dr. Miranda Milana provides comprehensive evaluation services for children and adolescents with a wide range of concerns, includingMiranda Milana PsyD headshot attention deficit disorders, communication disorders, intellectual disabilities, and learning disabilities. She particularly enjoys working with children and their families who have concerns regarding an autism spectrum disorder. Dr. Milana has received specialized training on the administration of the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS).

Dr. Milana places great emphasis on adapting her approach to a child’s developmental level and providing a testing environment that is approachable and comfortable for them. She also values collaboration with families and outside providers to facilitate supports and services that are tailored to a child’s specific needs.

Before joining NESCA, Dr. Milana completed a two-year postdoctoral fellowship at Boston Children’s Hospital in the Developmental Medicine department, where she received extensive training in the administration of psychological and neuropsychological testing. She has also received assessment training from Beacon Assessment Center and The Brenner Center. Dr. Milana graduated with her B.A. from the University of New England and went on to receive her doctorate from William James College (WJC). She was a part of the Children and Families of Adversity and Resilience (CFAR) program while at WJC. Her doctoral training also included therapeutic services across a variety of settings, including an elementary school, the Family Health Center of Worcester and at Roger Williams University.

Dr. Milana grew up in Maine and enjoys trips back home to see her family throughout the year. She currently resides in Wrentham, Massachusetts, with her husband and two golden retrievers. She also enjoys spending time with family and friends, reading, and cheering on the Patriots, Bruins, Red Sox, and Celtics.​

To book an appointment with Dr. Miranda Milana or another expert NESCA neuropsychologist, please complete our Intake Form today. 

NESCA is a pediatric neuropsychology practice and integrative treatment center with offices in Newton, Plainville, and Hingham, Massachusetts; Londonderry, New Hampshire; the greater Burlington, Vermont region; and Brooklyn, New York (coaching services only) serving clients from infancy through young adulthood and their families. For more information, please email info@nesca-newton.com or call 617-658-9800.

 

10
Map of Hingham, MA and quote by Dr. Moira Creedon

Strengthening the South Shore Community: Supporting Our Children, Teens, and Adults

By | NESCA Notes 2024

Map of Hingham, MA and quote by Dr. Moira CreedonBy: Moira Creedon, Ph.D. 
Pediatric Neuropsychologist, NESCA

It was an exciting dream realized when our NESCA South Shore office in Hingham opened in November 2023. As a resident of the South Shore, I was looking forward to connecting to my community closer to home. I was expecting to enjoy a shorter commute and great location. Pausing to reflect after 16 months with our doors open in Hingham, I realize that it is so much more.

I am grateful for how quickly we were welcomed by pediatricians, therapists, psychiatrists, tutors and executive functioning coaches, attorneys, advocates, and public and private schools. We have all quickly aligned on the needs of our communities. There are many children, teens, and adults struggling with gaps in learning, trouble with social connections, high anxiety, depressed mood, and behavioral troubles. Many of these collaborations have also communicated the frustration and sense of burnout facing families who feel like they have been working hard and trying to make changes. Teachers feel discouraged when they have dedicated their hearts and minds to support students, and yet students continue to struggle. Adults are also going through this in record numbers. The experience in our community is universal – it’s so hard to watch our kids, teens, young adults, and our contemporaries struggle.

This can leave many wondering if neuropsychological testing is just one more “hoop” to jump through. Within the trenches of the daily struggle, it can be hard to see how testing might help – especially when change is so slow. I do all that I can to explain why neuropsychological testing is way more than a hoop; it can be a roadmap. How?

  1. Even if you or your child has had “evaluations before,” neuropsychological testing is a chance at an integrated and comprehensive evaluation. What does that mean? It means that if you have had pieces of testing before, you still have a pile of pieces – an educational evaluation from school, a private OT evaluation, an early speech evaluation, a diagnostic interview with a therapist, etc. My goal is to take all of those pieces, plus the new ones I add, and put them together into one cohesive puzzle demonstrating how a child or teen thinks and learns.  This is one of the reasons NESCA does academic testing as part of its testing batteries, because these pieces are essential for diagnostic clarity, to see how the profile impacts a person’s real life skills/functioning, and because being a student is a kid or teen’s full time job. It’s not a piece to be overlooked.
  2. Neuropsychological testing can be a chance to understand the “why” when there are many complicated layers. When an individual is struggling, we often start in the middle of the process. Often, parents and/or schools want to try to solve the problem with school support, or interventions such as a referral to a therapist or connection to a social skills group. When those efforts stall, the impulse is to try a different solution.  Neuropsychological testing lets us step back, learn about a larger profile or picture of all aspects of a child’s learning or thinking to make meaning of what is happening. Then, we can choose a path for intervention that has the best chance of success. When a child is struggling, trying to see what works in a way that’s not fully informed or that addresses the child as a whole, is often not the best use of time and resources. The same goes for adults who seem to be missing a piece of their own puzzle.
  3. Neuropsychological testing uses the data collected from the testing to outline the steps for what to do next. Any good plan needs a detailed understanding of a problem. Oftentimes, it’s a combination of services that are needed – in the community, at home, and/or at school. It can be hard to figure out how to prioritize the steps, and it’s important to consider what is realistic and feasible. Neuropsychological evaluation can help make those steps clearer.
  4. Neuropsychological testing can give us a good baseline and measure of progress. Caretakers know their children best, so they can often spot subtle issues before they bloom into the bigger issues. Neuropsychological testing can be proactive, and it can help to track how a student responds to interventions. We can also use neuropsychological testing to maximize potential, including how students find their strengths, build their “academic diet” of courses in high school and college, and build stronger study skills along the way.
  5. At NESCA, neuropsychological testing involves important collaboration, perspective, and insight. The reason I mention the community that I’ve met through our South Shore office is because collaboration is key. The observations and insight offered by anyone who comes in contact with a child or teen is invaluable. Standardized test measures are a critical piece of the puzzle, but it’s one part of the critical triad of history, observations, and testing. These collaborations are also helpful to keep the neuropsychological test report “alive” as the community putting the recommendations into action works best through communication.

In the upcoming year, we set many goals for NESCA as a leader in our field. I want to pledge to my community that we will continue to provide the highest quality care and to respect and value our clients and families.  We will continue to build connections to our community members to join the efforts in supporting children, teens, and young adults. I am thrilled for upcoming opportunities to learn and grow alongside you all.  I am deeply grateful to be part of the South Shore community supporting children, teens, and young adults.

 

About the Author

Dr. Creedon offers her expertise in evaluating children and teens with a variety of presenting issues. SheMoira Creedon headshot is interested in uncovering an individual’s unique pattern of strengths and weaknesses to best formulate a plan for intervention and success. She tailors each assessment to address a range of referral questions, such as developmental disabilities, including Autism Spectrum Disorder, learning disabilities, attention challenges, executive functioning deficits, and social-emotional struggles. She also evaluates college-/grad school-age/adult individuals with developmental issues, such as ASD and ADHD, particularly when there is a diagnostic clarity or accommodation question.

 

If you are interested in booking an evaluation with Dr. Creedon or another NESCA neuropsychologist, please fill out and submit our online intake form. 

 

NESCA is a pediatric neuropsychology practice and integrative treatment center with offices in Newton, Plainville, and Hingham, Massachusetts; Londonderry, New Hampshire; the greater Burlington, Vermont region; and Brooklyn, NY (coaching services only) serving clients from infancy through young adulthood and their families. For more information, please email info@nesca-newton.com or call 617-658-9800.

50
Images of a neuropsych eval and questionnaires and quote from Sean Hyde O'Brien

Beyond the Scores: The Comprehensive Approach to Neuropsychological Evaluations

By | NESCA Notes 2024

Images of a neuropsych eval and questionnaires and quote from Sean Hyde O'BrienBy: Sean Hyde O’Brien, Psy.D., ABPdN 
Pediatric Neuropsychologist, NESCA

When parents think of a Neuropsychological Evaluation, they often envision their child completing a series of tests that generate scores. These test scores tell parents how their child is performing compared to a large group of other students their age across a wide range of cognitive and academic domains. While this is accurate, the evaluation process also integrates data from multiple sources beyond quantitative test scores to develop a comprehensive picture of your child. These other sources of data may be less obvious but are highly essential to developing an accurate “diagnostic formulation” of your child’s strengths and weaknesses, as well as interventions specifically tailored to support their individual neuropsychological profile.

Here’s an overview of the types of data typically involved:

  1. Clinical Interview:
  • Symptoms and Concerns: The individual’s description of their cognitive, behavioral, emotional, and academic symptoms, as well as those reported by family members or caregivers.
  • Birth, Developmental, and Medical History: Information about the individual’s birth, medical, psychological, and developmental history, including any past or current health conditions, injuries, or psychiatric disorders.
  • Family History: Information about any family history of neurological or psychological conditions that may help understand potential genetic or hereditary factors.
  • Academic and Psychosocial History: Insight into the individual’s social relationships, educational background, and occupational history to understand the impact of cognitive or emotional issues on daily functioning.
  1. Standardized Psychological/Neuropsychological Tests:

These are structured tasks designed to measure different aspects of cognitive and academic functioning. They provide objective data that help evaluate brain-behavior relations.

  • Intelligence Tests (IQ Tests): Assess overall cognitive ability and intellectual functioning. A common test is the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC-V).
  • Speech-Language Tests: Evaluate expressive, receptive, and pragmatic language skills, including verbal fluency, comprehension, and naming. Examples are the Boston Naming Test and the Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals (CELF-V).
  • Visual-Spatial Tests: Measure spatial processing, visual memory, and the ability to integrate visual and motor functions. Examples include the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test and the Block Design subtest from the WISC-V.
  • Sensory-Motor Tests: Assess motor skills, coordination, and fine motor skills (e.g., the Grooved Pegboard Test).
  • Memory and Learning Tests: Evaluate short-term, long-term, and working memory. Examples include the Wide Range Assessment of Memory and Learning (WRAML) and the California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT-C).
  • Attention and Executive Function Tests: Measure selective-sustained attention and cognitive flexibility, such as the Continuous Performance Test (CPT); as well as assess higher-order cognitive functions, such as planning, decision-making, problem-solving, and impulse control. Examples include the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) and the Tower of London task.
  • Academic Tests: Assess reading, writing, and mathematical skills. An example is the Wechsler Individual Achievement Test (WIAT-IV).
  1. Behavioral Observation:
  • Behavioral Observations During Testing: The examiner notes the individual’s behavior, mood, and engagement during the testing process. This can provide insight into areas, such as attention, motivation, or emotional regulation.
  • Classroom/Program Observations: This can involve observing a child’s functioning in a “real life” setting and provide insight about their ability to apply the skills noted in their test findings to more complex environments.
  1. Behavioral Rating Scales and Self-Report Questionnaires:

These are used to assess subjective experiences related to mood, behavior, and cognitive functioning.

  • Broad Band Rating Scales: Provide information about the individual’s functioning across multiple domains, which can be helpful to identifying areas of concern for additional investigation. An example is the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL).
  • Targeted/Narrow Band Rating Scales: Provide information about specific domains, such as depression and/or anxiety, which can be helpful for gaining a deeper understanding of an individual’s particular symptom profile. One example is the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI).
  1. Collateral Information:
  • Reports from Family Members, Teachers, Coaches, and Tutors: Provide insight from those who know the individual well, often providing information about changes in behavior, memory, or mood.
  • School or Occupational Records: Include academic performance, work-related difficulties, or other performance metrics that may be reviewed to understand the functional impact of cognitive or emotional difficulties.
  1. Neuroimaging and Medical Data (if applicable):
  • Brain Imaging (e.g., MRI, CT scans, PET scans): Used to identify brain abnormalities, such as lesions, atrophy, or structural damage, which may contribute to cognitive impairments.
  • EEG or Evoked Potentials: Sometimes used to assess electrical activity in the brain, particularly if seizures or other neurological concerns are present.
  • Medical Reports: Data on neurological conditions, medications, or surgeries that may impact cognitive or emotional functioning.

By combining these different types of data, a neuropsychologist can create a comprehensive picture of an individual’s cognitive strengths and weaknesses, helping to identify any underlying neurological conditions or psychological factors that are contributing to their difficulties. While test scores are always important, interpreting your child’s performance on neuropsychological tests without the additional data outlined above can lead to misdiagnosis, ineffective treatment, and other unforeseen complications.

 

About the Author

Dr. Sean O’Brien has been providing comprehensive neuropsychological evaluations in the GreaterSean Hyde O'Brien Boston area since 2006. He specializes in the assessment of children and adolescents who present with a wide range of developmental conditions, such as  Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder, Specific Learning Disorder (reading, writing, math), Intellectual Disability, and Autism Spectrum Disorder; as well as children whose cognitive functioning has been impacted by medical, psychiatric, and genetic conditions. He also has extensive experience working with children who were adopted both domestically and internationally.

To schedule an appointment with one of NESCA’s neuropsychologists, please complete our online intake form. 

NESCA is a pediatric neuropsychology practice and integrative treatment center with offices in Newton, Plainville, and Hingham, Massachusetts; Londonderry, New Hampshire; the greater Burlington, Vermont region; and Brooklyn, NY (coaching services only) serving clients from infancy through young adulthood and their families. For more information, please email info@nesca-newton.com or call 617-658-9800.

50
Poster stating Disability not a bad word and a quote from Kelley Challen

Disability is Not a Dirty Word—It’s a Legal Term

By | NESCA Notes 2024

Poster stating Disability not a bad word and a quote from Kelley ChallenBy: Kelley Challen, Ed.M., CAS
Director of Transition Services, NESCA

I recently listened to a podcast where the host shared that she avoids using the term “disability” because she doesn’t want her child to feel limited.

This really made me think. The word “disability” can feel heavy and tied to stigma, but it is not synonymous with limitation. In fact, it doesn’t describe anything about a person’s potential or specify what they can or cannot do. It’s simply a term—a legal one—that ensures access to equal rights, accommodations, and opportunities.

Yes, people with disabilities might use tools, supports, or accommodations to learn, work, and navigate the world. But needing those supports isn’t a limitation—it’s about finding ways to thrive and share unique strengths and abilities.

As a parent and professional who does not identify as disabled, I believe it’s essential to reflect on our own feelings and biases about the word “disability.” If we avoid using it because it makes us uncomfortable, how might that impact our children as they grow and learn to advocate for themselves?

When we don’t teach kids to understand and embrace the term “disability,” we might unintentionally limit their access to the tools, rights, and opportunities they deserve to realize their potential. Additionally, if we avoid using the term “disability” or reframe it when we hear it, we implicitly teach our children that it’s a “dirty word” and possibly associate it with shame.

Understanding disability as a legal term is particularly important because many critical services and protections are only available to those who identify as having a disability. These include:

  • Individualized Education Programs (IEPs) and 504 Plans, which provide accommodations and support in school settings.
  • Standardized testing accommodations, such as extended time, alternative test formats, or assistive technology for standardized exams like the SAT, ACT, and college entrance tests.
  • Vocational Rehabilitation Services, which offer career counseling, job training, and workplace accommodations.
  • Social Security Disability Benefits (SSI/SSDI), which provide financial assistance to eligible individuals with disabilities.
  • College disability support services, which can include priority registration, note-taking assistance, alternative testing arrangements, and more.
  • Workplace accommodations under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), such as modified work schedules, assistive technology, or accessible office spaces.
  • Access to independent living programs and community supports that help individuals with disabilities navigate housing, transportation, and daily living needs.

We can’t break down stigma if we’re afraid to name it. Let’s change the narrative: Disability is just a term, not a measure of someone’s potential.

About the Author
Kelley Challen, Ed.M., CAS, is an expert transition specialist and national speaker with over 20 years of experience supporting youth andKelley Challen headshot young adults with diverse developmental and learning abilities. Since 2013, she has served as Director of Transition Services at NESCA, offering individualized transition assessments, planning, consultation, coaching, and program development. She specializes in working with students with complex profiles who may not engage with traditional testing tools or programs. Ms. Challen holds a BA in Psychology and a Minor in Hispanic Studies from The College of William and Mary, along with a Master’s and Certificate of Advanced Graduate Study in Risk and Prevention Counseling from the Harvard Graduate School of Education. She is a member of CEC, DCDT, and COPAA, believing it’s vital for all IEP participants to have accurate information about transition planning. Ms. Challen has also been actively involved in the MA DESE IEP Improvement Project, mentored candidates in UMass Boston’s Transition Leadership Program, and co-authored a chapter in Technology Tools for Students with Autism.

To schedule an appointment with one of NESCA’s transition specialists, please complete our online intake form. 

NESCA is a pediatric neuropsychology practice and integrative treatment center with offices in Newton, Plainville, and Hingham, Massachusetts; Londonderry, New Hampshire; the greater Burlington, Vermont region; and Brooklyn, NY (coaching services only) serving clients from infancy through young adulthood and their families. For more information, please email info@nesca-newton.com or call 617-658-9800.

12
child saying no to food.

Beyond Picky Eating: Understanding ARFID in Children

By | NESCA Notes 2024

child saying no to food.By: Maggie Rodriguez, Psy.D.
Pediatric Neuropsychologist, NESCA

Feeding children is one of the many aspects of parenting that seems pretty straightforward before you have kids of your own. But most parents will tell you that it can actually be mind-bogglingly difficult. That’s because “picky eating” is very common, so much so that it’s considered a normal developmental phase in early childhood. In fact, almost half of typically developing children go through a phase of “picky eating,” and the prevalence is even higher in children with neurodivergences, such as Autism Spectrum Disorder. The good news is that, as frustrating as picky eating can be, most children naturally outgrow this phase and eventually expand their diets to include more than chicken nuggets and buttered pasta. However, there is a subset of picky eaters for whom their selective food choices are part of a more serious problem that requires intervention.

In some case, highly selective eating may signal the presence of a condition called Avoidant Restrictive Food Intake Disorder or ARFID. A diagnosis of ARFID is made when an individual’s picky or selective eating is severe enough to cause secondary problems, such as nutritional deficiencies, reduced growth or weight loss, and/or social-emotional difficulties.

Unfortunately, little is understood about the underlying causes of ARFID. However, most people with ARFID fall into one or more of these three “subtypes,” each of which derives from different underlying factors.

  • In some cases, anxiety about choking, vomiting, or allergies drives avoidance of certain foods. This appears to be a factor for up to half of all children with ARFID and may develop after a traumatic experience, such as an illness.
  • Sensory sensitivities are another underlying factor for some individuals. These people may respond more intensely and/or have aversions to particular textures or flavors. Roughly one out of five of those with ARFID endorse sensitivities to flavors, textures, or smells. Interestingly, “supertasters”—people who have a higher concentration of taste buds—experience flavors much more intensely than is typical. These individuals may be more likely to develop ARFID as they avoid bitter foods.
  • Additionally, some people simply experience fewer hunger cues and may forget to eat or simply have a low level of interest in and motivation for eating. In these cases, individuals may be willing to eat a broader range of foods but struggle to eat enough.

Importantly, unlike most other eating disorders, ARFID is NOT related to concerns about body image or a desire to lose weight. It’s also important to recognize that ARFID is NOT just extremely picky eating, and individuals with ARFID won’t simply “outgrow” it.

Regardless of the initial triggering factors, limited or restricted intake is maintained by avoidance. That’s why early identification and treatment is important. It is also critical in order to prevent the development of potentially serious health problems related to nutritional issues, which can, in turn, cause difficulties ranging from fatigue and poor concentration to anemia, reduced immune system functioning, stunted growth, and even delayed puberty. Individuals with ARFID are also at risk of experiencing diminished self-esteem, may struggle to take part in social situations that center around food (e.g., meals with others), and develop emotional distress.

Though ARFID can be challenging to address, there are effective treatments. The goals of treatment depend upon individual factors but typically involve restoring weight if necessary, reducing anxiety, and gradually introducing new foods. Specific treatment modalities include family-based treatment, cognitive behavioral therapy, and exposure and response prevention. Treatment may also involve working with a physician and/or dietician.

If you’re concerned that your child’s “picky eating” may be more than a phase, please reach out to a professional who can further assess the situation and provide direction. There are screening tools that may be helpful in providing direction. One such resource can be found here: https://equip.health/arfid-screener. You can also contact the National Eating Disorders Association (NEDA) Helpline at 1-800-931-2237 or by texting NEDA to 741-741.

References/Resources

https://www.chop.edu/news/dos-and-donts-feeding-picky-eaters#:~:text=Do%20remember%20that%20picky%20eating,2%20to%20about%20age%204.

https://equip.health/conditions/arfid

https://www.nationaleatingdisorders.org/avoidant-restrictive-food-intake-disorder-arfid/

 

About the Author

Maggie Rodriguez, Psy.D., provides comprehensive evaluation services for children, adolescents, and young adults with often complex presentations. She particularly enjoys working with individuals who have concerns about attention and executive functioning, language-based learning disorders, and those with overlapping cognitive and social/emotional difficulties.

Prior to joining NESCA, Dr. Rodriguez worked in private practice, where she completed assessments with high-functioning students presenting with complex cognitive profiles whose areas of weakness may have gone previously undiagnosed. Dr. Rodriguez’s experience also includes pre- and post-doctoral training in the Learning Disability Clinic at Boston Children’s Hospital and the Neurodevelopmental Center at MassGeneral for Children/North Shore Medical Center. Dr. Rodriguez has spent significant time working with students in academic settings, including k-12 public and charter school systems and private academic programs, such as the Threshold Program at Lesley University.

Dr. Rodriguez earned her Psy.D. from William James College in 2012, where her coursework and practicum training focused on clinical work with children and adolescents and on assessment. Her doctoral thesis centered on cultural issues related to evaluation.

Dr. Rodriguez lives north of Boston with her husband and three young children.  She enjoys spending time outdoors hiking and bike riding with her family, practicing yoga, and reading.

To book a consultation with Dr. Rodriguez or one of our many other expert neuropsychologists, complete NESCA’s online intake form.

NESCA is a pediatric neuropsychology practice and integrative treatment center with offices in Newton, Plainville, and Hingham, Massachusetts; Londonderry, New Hampshire; the greater Burlington, Vermont region; and Brooklyn, NY, serving clients from infancy through young adulthood and their families. For more information, please email info@nesca-newton.com or call 617-658-9800.

Skip to content